About
RED
Ended--
Last price (USDT)
342.06K
24h total (USDT)
1.50M
Total vol (USDT)
2025-02-27 10:00:00 ~ 2025-03-06 12:30:00
Trading time (UTC+0)
2025-03-06 14:00:00 ~ 2025-03-06 18:00:00
Delivery time (UTC+0)
Total supply1.00B
Resources
Introduction
RedStone is a modular oracle supporting 140+ clients including Morpho, Pendle, Spark, Venus, Ethena, Etherfi, Lombard and many more. While RedStone is live on 70+ chains including the upcoming ones like Monad, Berachain, MegaETH, Unichain, it also ensures further innovation on established ecosystems i.e. Ethereum or Base. Thanks to RedStone reliable infrastructure DeFi teams can build their solutions withought limiatations met with legacy oracle providers. As the only oracle RedStone provides both Push and Pull oracle model cross-chain.
RedStone launches settlement layer to address RWA liquidity gap in DeFi lending
According to ChainCatcher, decentralized oracle service provider RedStone has officially launched RedStone Settle, a settlement layer product for decentralized finance, aiming to address structural barriers faced when tokenized real world assets (RWA) are used as collateral in lending protocols. The core mechanism of this product is on-chain auctions: when a lending protocol triggers a liquidation event, liquidity providers can immediately step in to purchase relevant positions, providing instant liquidity to the protocol while assuming the redemption delay risk of the underlying assets themselves. This approach aims to bridge the mismatch between the near-instant liquidation required by DeFi platforms (such as Aave) and the typical 60 to 180 day redemption cycle of RWA, including tokenized funds and bonds. RedStone stated that this solution could activate more than $3 billion worth of idle tokenized RWA in DeFi, enabling users to lend and borrow more efficiently with yield-generating positions. According to data from RWA.xyz, excluding stablecoins, the current tokenized RWA market exceeds $3 billion, mainly dominated by exposure to U.S. Treasury bonds and private credit products.
REDNEW fluctuated 42.2% in 24 hours: Low liquidity DEX trading amplified the movement, no clear catalyst
Volatility Overview In the past 24 hours, REDNEW price rebounded from a low of $0.1267 to a high of $0.1802, currently reported at $0.1647, with a fluctuation amplitude of 42.2%. Trading volume data shows no significant signs of abnormal enlargement; overall liquidity remains low and is easily affected by scattered buy and sell orders. Brief Analysis of the Cause of Abnormal Movements - No official announcements, mainstream news, or large whale on-chain actions were recorded in the past 24 hours. - The sharp price volatility was mainly amplified by low liquidity DEX trading, resembling several recent rebound patterns (for example, the April 6-7 move from around $0.10 to a high of $0.22), where the order books can easily result in extreme swings. Market Outlook and Perspective There is scarce community discussion, with no high-traffic REDNEW related posts on the X platform in the past 24 hours; similar low-liquidity tokens (such as $RED) show sporadic FOMO signals, but mainstream sentiment remains cautious. Analysts highlight the high-risk nature of low liquidity and the susceptibility to pullbacks without continuous buying support. The market may continue to oscillate, with further caution needed for potential liquidity depletion. Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring, for informational reference only.
REDNEW (REDNEW) fluctuated 52.6% within 24 hours: amplified by low liquidity DEX trading, no clear catalyst
Volatility Overview In the past 24 hours, REDNEW's price rebounded from a low of $0.1588 to a high of $0.2423. The current price is approximately $0.1947–0.1999, reflecting a dramatic V-shaped fluctuation with an amplitude of 52.6%. There is no publicly reported 24-hour trading volume or data on capital inflow/outflow, which may be due to the limited data coverage typical of low-liquidity small-cap tokens. Brief Analysis of the Cause of the Price Movement • No clear news, official announcements, or on-chain monitoring records within the past 24 hours serve as direct catalysts. • The volatility is mainly amplified by low-liquidity DEX trading, making small-cap tokens susceptible to extreme price swings from relatively small capital flows. Market Opinion and Outlook Market analysis indicates that such fluctuations lack sustainable drivers and represent typical behavior for low-liquidity small tokens. The Bitget report emphasizes “no clear 24h catalyst” and suggests caution regarding the risk of further corrections. There have been no significant discussions or forecasts from mainstream communities or analysts regarding future trends. Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring, and is for informational reference only.
REDNEW (REDNEW) fluctuates 52.6% in 24 hours: rebound amplified by low-liquidity DEX trading, no clear catalyst
Brief Volatility Overview In the past 24 hours, REDNEW price rebounded from a low of $0.1588 to a high of $0.2423, currently quoted at $0.1999, with a volatility amplitude of 52.6%. According to Bitget data, a similar range saw a rebound from approximately $0.1018-$0.1058 lows to a high of $0.2252. There is currently no detailed public disclosure of 24-hour trading volume and net capital inflow/outflow data. The low liquidity DEX environment has amplified these volatility effects. Brief Analysis of Abnormal Price Movement Causes • Low liquidity DEX trading dominance: The price rebound was mainly amplified by a low liquidity DEX environment, lacking any significant 24-hour news events, official announcements, or large whale on-chain transactions as driving forces. • No verifiable catalysts: No mainstream news, capital inflows, or on-chain abnormal activity were observed in the past 24 hours; the volatility appears more liquidity-driven rather than caused by fundamental events. Market Views and Outlook Most mainstream market opinions believe this rebound lacks a sustainable catalyst. Community sentiment is biased towards short-term FOMO with the risk of a pullback. Bitget’s analysis highlights that the low liquidity amplification effect may lead to a rapid reversal; in terms of outlook, analysts warn of overheated structures without fundamental support and recommend monitoring signals of liquidity improvement. Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring, and is for informational purposes only.
REDNEW (REDNEW) 24-hour amplitude 112.9%: Low liquidity DEX trading amplifies rebound, no clear catalyst
Volatility Brief In the past 24 hours, the price of REDNEW rebounded from a low of $0.1058 to a high of $0.2252, currently quoted at $0.1837, with a fluctuation amplitude reaching 112.9%. Trading of this token mainly occurs on low-liquidity DEX platforms, and no publicly available reports provide specific 24-hour trading volume data. Brief Analysis of Abnormal Movement Reasons - No clear 24-hour news events, official announcements, or large on-chain whale activities have driven the move. Monitoring by Bitget indicates that the rebound lacks a clear catalyst. - The volatility is mainly amplified by trading on low-liquidity DEX platforms, with a rapid surge from a low of $0.1018 (or $0.1009) to $0.2252. Market Views and Outlook The prevailing market sentiment is cautious, with traders viewing the current state as an "euphoric stretch," and anticipating a high risk of pullback or sell-off. As noted in X platform analysis, "dump incoming," and it is advised to wait for confirmation of a retracement. Community discussions emphasize not chasing highs following abnormal trading volumes, instead focusing on support levels such as $0.1213 or $0.1180. Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring and is for informational reference only.
REDNEW fluctuated 121.2% in 24 hours: Amplified by low-liquidity DEX trading, no clear catalyst
Volatility Overview In the past 24 hours, the price of REDNEW rebounded from a low of $0.1018 to a high of $0.2252, with the current quote around $0.1821. The price swing reached 121.2%, showing a clear V-shaped volatility. There is no public key data such as 24-hour trading volume or net capital inflows/outflows, possibly due to limited data coverage caused by the low liquidity of this small-cap token. Analysis of Abnormal Movement Causes - No official announcements, mainstream news, exchange listings, or partnership events are available as verifiable catalysts within the past 24 hours. - No on-chain evidence of large transactions or whale purchases; searches on CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, DexScreener, and X show no related activities. - The volatility is mainly amplified by low liquidity DEX trading, which is a common phenomenon among emerging small-cap tokens. Market View and Outlook Market attention is extremely low, with no discussions on X community or forecasts by mainstream analysts. Bitget highlights the risks of low liquidity, which may trigger further pullbacks or rug pulls. Caution is advised. Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring, and is for informational purposes only.
REDNEW fluctuated 121.2% in 24 hours: amplified by low-liquidity DEX trading, no clear 24h catalyst
Volatility Overview In the past 24 hours, the price of REDNEW rebounded from a low of $0.1018 to a high of $0.2252 and is currently quoted at $0.1797, with a fluctuation amplitude of 121.2%, showing a sharp V-shaped volatility. There have been no public reports on 24-hour trading volume, net capital inflow/outflow, and other data, possibly due to limited data coverage on illiquid small-cap tokens. Brief Analysis of Unusual Movement - No official announcements, mainstream news, exchange listings, or partnership events. - No evidence of large on-chain transactions or whale purchases; CoinGecko/CoinMarketCap/DexScreener/X searches showed no related activity. - The volatility is likely amplified by low DEX liquidity, which is common among emerging small-cap tokens. Market View and Outlook Market attention is extremely low, with no X community discussions or analyst predictions; Bitget has issued a warning on low liquidity risks, which could potentially lead to further corrections or a rug pull. Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring, for informational reference only.
REDNEW (REDNEW) surges 45.8% in 24 hours: price rebounds from a low of $0.1009 to $0.1471, with no clear 24h catalyst event identified
Volatility Brief In the past 24 hours, REDNEW price touched a low of $0.1009 and reached a high of $0.1471. The current quote is $0.1471, with an overall price swing of 45.8%, showing a clear V-shaped rebound pattern. According to public market data, there is no exact 24-hour trading volume or net capital inflow data available for this token, possibly due to its low liquidity and limited data coverage. Brief Analysis of the Cause of the Price Movement - Searches on CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, DexScreener, and X in the past 24 hours (2026-04-05 to 04-06) found no official REDNEW announcements, mainstream news, on-chain large transactions or whale purchases, or other verifiable events. - There is no evidence showing that project updates, exchange listings or partnership announcements directly fueled the price movement. Tokens with similar names (such as ReNeW or RED TOKEN) have stable prices and have not shown correlation. - The abnormal price movement may be due to the amplification effect of DEX low liquidity trading, which is common among small meme coins or emerging tokens. Market Opinions and Outlook - There is no mainstream sentiment or forecast regarding REDNEW in community or X discussions—the search returns no results, indicating extremely low attention. - No analyst views available. Risk warning: Low liquidity can cause drastic price fluctuation. Caution against pullbacks and potential rug pull risks is advised. Wait for more on-chain data to validate sustainability. Note: This analysis is automatically generated by AI based on public data and on-chain monitoring and is for informational reference only.
Ether holds $2K as traders make push toward overhead short liquidity
Ether (ETH) climbed back above $2,000 on Monday as the altcoin’s derivatives market activity intensified across major exchanges. Data shows more than 110,000 Ether flowed into derivatives platforms, while a key leverage indicator surged to new highs. The activity points to a rapid buildup of speculative positioning, suggesting traders are preparing for increased volatility as ETH attempts to break out of its monthly trading range. Ether derivatives inflows meet rising leverage ratio Ether derivatives exchanges recorded a netflow of 110,343 ETH on March 7, the third-largest spike in 2026. A larger move occurred on Feb. 6, when ETH rallied roughly 13% from its yearly low at $1,736. Ether exchange netflow (Total) on derivative exchanges: Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant data shows that the earlier spikes in derivatives inflows frequently preceded short-term drawdowns or periods of sharp volatility. At the same time, Ether’s estimated leverage ratio climbed to a record 0.78 on Wednesday, exceeding the previous high of 0.778 recorded on Jan. 1. The metric tracks the amount of open interest relative to exchange reserves, and it is widely used to gauge how aggressively traders employ borrowed capital. Ether estimated leveraged-ratio: Source: CryptoQuant A higher reading means a larger share of the positions rely on leverage. Such conditions tend to amplify the price move in either direction as liquidations build across the derivatives markets. Key liquidity sits near $2,050 Ether trades inside a monthly range between $1,800 and $2,000 following a swing failure pattern near $2,150 last Wednesday. The rejection signaled profit-taking above local highs, and the price retraced to the internal liquidity levels near $1,900 and $1,950 formed early last week. The one-hour chart now shows a bullish pivot on the one-hour timeframe, which tracks the recovery on Monday after a liquidity sweep happened near $1,908 on Sunday. Ether one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView The market’s current attention may shift toward the supply zone between $2,050 and $2,100 formed late last week. A clear breakout above that range and establishing it as support may allow ETH to break significantly above $2,150. The seven-day liquidation data from CoinGlass shows a dense cluster of short positions above the current price. Roughly $273 million in cumulative short-liquidation leverage sits near $2,030. Large concentrations of short liquidations often act as magnet levels for the price. A move into that zone may trigger forced buybacks from the overleveraged short positions, which may accelerate the upside volatility if tagged in quick succession. ETH exchange liquidation map. Source: CoinGlass Crypto analyst Cyril-DeFi noted that ETH/USD is also testing a long-term ascending trendline that has supported the price several times since the last market cycle. The analyst said, “Every time the price touched this support, it eventually led to a strong bounce. Right now, the $1.9k–$2k area looks like a key level that could determine the next move.” Ether one-week analysis by Cyril-DeFi. Source: X
RedStone has deployed its price oracle on the Stellar network.
Odaily reported that following a $10 million oracle vulnerability attack, oracle service provider RedStone announced the deployment of price oracles on the Stellar network. This deployment aims to enhance the security and functionality of the Stellar ecosystem, while providing developers with a reliable source of price information.
Experts Debate Vitalik Buterin’s Creator Coin Vision
Back to the list Experts Debate Vitalik Buterin’s Creator Coin Vision thedefiant.io 5 m A recent post by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin on creator coins has sparked fresh debate, with experts agreeing on the problem but split on how to fix it. In his post, shared on Feb. 1, Buterin argued that the biggest problem in today’s creator economy is no longer motivating people to create content. Instead, he said the challenge is finding quality in a world flooded with posts, videos, and AI-generated material. “In the 20s, there's plenty of content, AI can generate an entire metaverse full of it for like $10. The problem is quality. And so your goal is not *incentivizing content*, it's *surfacing good content*,” he wrote. To fix that, Buterin proposes a different approach: Curated DAOs that decide which creators matter. Buterin said tokens would still exist, but mainly as prediction tools, allowing people to bet on which creators these groups will choose. “So the ultimate decider of who rises and falls is not speculators, but high-value content creators (we make the assumption that good creators are also good judges of quality, which seems often true),” Buterin said. Experts are Divided Some builders said the idea is a step forward, but still falls short. Oxytocin, head of ecosystem at Umia, explained that while Vitalik’s solution “introduces a level of welfare creation through prediction markets,” it still lacks “a proper offchain enforcement mechanism,” leaving token holders with little assurance that creators will remain aligned over the long term. He added that creators could even potentially ignore prediction markets after being admitted to the creator DAO. Others were more supportive of Buterin’s focus on curation. Marcin Kazmierczak, co-founder of RedStone, said the proposal improves how incentives work. “The prediction market doesn’t just create speculation; it creates informed discovery,” he said. “Token holders win by accurately predicting which creators DAOs will value, which means they have incentives to actually discover quality rather than chase attention metrics.” However, Neil Staunton, CEO and co-founder of Superset, took a more skeptical view. “The diagnosis is correct, but the cure may be worse than the disease,” he said. “DAOs have consistently struggled with governance capture, voter apathy, and insider dynamics; now we're asking them to be arbiters of creative quality?” He added that prediction markets only work when outcomes are objectively verifiable. “You're building a prediction market on subjective taste filtered through DAO politics,” he said. “The real question is whether creative work should be tokenized at all, or whether we're forcing a financial primitive onto something that doesn't need one.” Latest news Trump earns praise for kid seed funds with Robinhood as trustee, but there are downsides crypto.news 4 m Pi Network rolls out major updates to boost mainnet migration, KYC submissions crypto.news 8 m White House crypto meeting didn't yet find answer to stablecoin yield in Senate bill coindesk.com 24 m Russia's biggest bitcoin mining firm's founder arrested for tax evasion while his company faces bankruptcy coindesk.com 24 m Bitcoin Bulls Eye Rebound as TD Sequential Flashes Major Buy Signals blockchainreporter.net 24 m Bloomberg Senior Analyst Mike McGlone Predicts How Low Bitcoin Price Could Fall! en.bitcoinsistemi.com 29 m Top 5 Cryptocurrencies
RedStone acquires Security Token Market to accelerate the adoption of tokenized assets
Oracle service provider RedStone has acquired the digital asset data platform Security Token Market (STM.co) and its annual conference TokenizeThis, aiming to promote the adoption of real-world asset tokenization and expand its influence in the US and institutional markets. Founded in 2018, STM operates the world's largest database of tokenized real-world assets, tracking over 800 on-chain stocks, real estate, debt instruments, and funds, with a total market capitalization exceeding $60 billions. The TokenizeThis conference brings together banks, asset management institutions, regulators, issuers, and blockchain leaders to discuss asset tokenization in both traditional finance and decentralized finance.
RedStone Acquisition of Security Token Market Unlocks Strategic Power in RWA Tokenization Race
In a strategic move consolidating the blockchain data and tokenization sectors, oracle provider RedStone has acquired the Security Token Market platform and its conference business. This acquisition, reported by Cointelegraph on March 21, 2025, grants RedStone immediate access to a vast repository of data covering over 800 tokenized real-world assets. Consequently, the deal signals a significant shift in the infrastructure supporting the multi-trillion-dollar real-world asset tokenization market. RedStone Acquisition Reshapes the Tokenization Data Landscape The undisclosed acquisition of Security Token Market represents a pivotal convergence of two critical blockchain infrastructure layers. RedStone, known for its modular oracle solutions that deliver high-frequency financial data to decentralized applications, now integrates a premier source for security token and RWA data. Security Token Market has established itself as a leading aggregator and analytics platform for tokenized securities. Therefore, this merger creates a comprehensive data powerhouse. Security Token Market’s dataset is particularly valuable. It encompasses detailed information on hundreds of tokenized products across multiple asset classes. For instance, these include: Equities: Tokenized stocks and fractional shares. Real Estate: Property-backed digital securities. Fixed Income: Tokenized bonds and debt instruments. Investment Funds: Digitally represented private equity and venture funds. This acquisition provides RedStone with unparalleled depth in a market segment poised for explosive growth. Major financial institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan have actively entered the RWA space, highlighting its mainstream potential. By securing this proprietary data trove, RedStone strategically positions itself as an essential middleware provider for the next wave of institutional blockchain adoption. The Strategic Rationale Behind the Merger Analysts view this move as a logical and powerful vertical integration. Oracles act as bridges between blockchains and external data, which is the lifeblood of DeFi and RWA applications. Previously, RedStone focused on delivering price feeds for cryptocurrencies and traditional financial markets. Now, it can offer verified, granular data on the performance, compliance status, and liquidity of specific tokenized assets. This capability is a game-changer for developers. Furthermore, the deal includes the brand rights to Security Token Market’s prominent tokenization conference series. This asset provides RedStone with a direct channel to industry leaders, regulators, and builders in the RWA ecosystem. Conferences serve as critical hubs for networking, deal-making, and setting industry standards. Controlling a major event brand significantly boosts RedStone’s influence and authority within the niche. Key Assets Transferred in the Acquisition Asset Type Description Strategic Value to RedStone Data Repository Information on 800+ tokenized RWAs Core product expansion, new revenue streams Analytics Platform STM’s website and market dashboards Direct user engagement, market intelligence Conference Brand Security Token Market event series Thought leadership, business development Industry Relationships STM’s network of issuers and investors Accelerated market penetration The transaction reflects a broader trend of consolidation in crypto infrastructure. As the industry matures, leading players are acquiring complementary technologies and datasets to build more robust, full-stack offerings. This trend mirrors the evolution of traditional tech and finance sectors, where integrated platforms often dominate fragmented markets. Expert Analysis on Market Impact and Future Integration Industry experts point to the timing of this deal as particularly astute. Regulatory clarity for digital assets has increased in key jurisdictions like the EU, UK, and parts of Asia throughout 2024 and early 2025. This clarity has reduced uncertainty for institutional participants looking to tokenize assets. A reliable, authoritative data source for these tokens becomes exponentially more valuable in a regulated environment. The integration path will be critical to watch. Success hinges on RedStone’s ability to seamlessly merge STM’s specialized RWA data into its existing oracle data streams and developer tools. The company will likely create new API products and premium data feeds tailored for institutions building tokenization platforms, compliance tools, and secondary trading markets. Potential challenges include data standardization and maintaining the neutrality and accuracy of the aggregated information. This move also applies competitive pressure on other oracle providers like Chainlink and Pyth Network. While they offer broad data coverage, RedStone’s deep vertical integration into RWA data could give it a defensible moat in this high-growth segment. The race is no longer just about data delivery speed and cost, but also about niche data comprehensiveness and domain expertise. Conclusion The RedStone acquisition of Security Token Market is a landmark deal that fundamentally alters the data infrastructure for real-world asset tokenization. By combining a leading oracle network with a premier RWA data aggregator, RedStone creates a uniquely powerful platform for the next generation of financial applications. This strategic consolidation provides developers and institutions with the verified, comprehensive data necessary to build trust and liquidity in tokenized markets. Ultimately, the merger accelerates the convergence of traditional finance and decentralized technology, paving the way for a more integrated and efficient global financial system. FAQs Q1: What does RedStone gain from acquiring Security Token Market? RedStone gains immediate access to a proprietary dataset covering over 800 tokenized real-world assets, including stocks, real estate, and bonds. Additionally, it acquires a leading industry conference brand, significantly expanding its influence and product offerings in the RWA tokenization sector. Q2: Why is data on tokenized real-world assets so valuable? High-quality, verified data is the foundation for functional markets. For tokenized RWAs, data on asset performance, legal compliance, and liquidity is essential for pricing, trading, and risk management. This data is currently fragmented, making a comprehensive aggregator like STM a strategic asset. Q3: How might this acquisition affect other oracle providers? The deal increases competition by raising the stakes for niche data expertise. Other oracle providers may seek similar partnerships or acquisitions to offer specialized data feeds, moving beyond generic price data to value-added information services for specific verticals like RWAs. Q4: What are the potential challenges in integrating these two platforms? Key challenges include technically merging different data formats and systems, maintaining data accuracy and neutrality post-acquisition, and effectively cross-selling the combined services to both existing crypto-native and new institutional client bases. Q5: What does this mean for the future of real-world asset tokenization? This consolidation signals maturation. The emergence of robust, dedicated data infrastructure reduces a major friction point for institutional adoption. It enables more sophisticated financial products, improved liquidity, and greater transparency, which are all necessary for the RWA market to scale to its full potential.
Morph Integrates RedStone Oracle for Real-Time, Secure Pricing for On-Chain Payments
Morph, a renowned on-chain settlement and payment platform, has integrated with RedStone Oracle, a prominent blockchain oracle ecosystem. The strategic integration improves real-time pricing reliability within Morph’s network. As per Morph’s social media announcement, the integration attempts to provide verifiable, accurate, and secure price feeds for financial settlements and payments on-chain. Thus, the move fortifies Morph’s capability to back real-world financial utilities at scale. Reliable pricing for the real world. Morph is integrating with leading modular oracle to deliver secure, real-time price feeds. Together, we’re strengthening data accuracy across payment and settlement flows onchain. Learn more ↓ — Morph (@MorphNetwork) January 16, 2026 RedStone Integration Accelerates Real-Time Price Feeds for On-Chain Payments on Morph With this integration, RedStone has become a crucial oracle platform working within the Morph network. In this respect, it supplies both push-based and pull-based price feeds. The pull-based design of RedStone permits applications to bring pricing data just when required. This decreases costs while also maintaining significant accuracy during execution. The respective architecture is specifically adequate for settlements and payment flows, where there is requirement of precise pricing at the time of transfer. As a result of this, Morph can back relatively complicated financial logic while making no compromise on security or efficiency. The partnership also enhances backing for Forex conversions and multi-currency settlements. With the data cryptographically signed, Morph-built apps get extra protection against fraud and manipulation. The respective features are needed for utilities like cross-border payments, treasury management, payroll processing, and merchant payouts. Expanding Ecosystem with Real-World Decentralized Payments Keeping this in view, Morph deems this integration as another step in its wider strategy to develop real-world, scalable infrastructure for on-chain finance. With RedStone working as its primary oracle partner, the platform keeps advancing its ecosystem to benefit users, businesses, and developers looking for decentralized solutions for payments. Ultimately, the partnership fortifies Morph’s status as a next-gen hub for on-chain payments.
Canton Network Partners with RedStone Oracles to Power $6 Trillion Tokenized Asset Ecosystem
Quick Breakdown Canton Network partners with RedStone Oracles to provide reliable data for a $6 trillion tokenized asset ecosystem. The collaboration ensures real-time, verified feeds for interest rates, FX, commodities, and corporate actions, enabling compliant on-chain finance. Strategic investments from Goldman Sachs and BNP Paribas support Canton’s expansion and institutional adoption of blockchain. The Canton Network has announced a strategic partnership with RedStone Oracles to provide the critical data infrastructure for its growing real-world asset (RWA) ecosystem, valued at $6 trillion. The collaboration aims to enable institutional-grade tokenization of assets such as real estate, bonds, commodities, and private equity, bringing unprecedented scale and reliability to blockchain-based finance. Applications for Canton’s RWA ecosystem are now powered by @RedStone_DeFi ’s real-time, customizable data feeds. With Canton’s configurable privacy and RedStone’s gas-efficient oracle architecture, institutions can now automate complex workflows for treasuries, private credit,… pic.twitter.com/pj8h25a7fY — Canton Network (@CantonNetwork) December 9, 2025 Bridging traditional finance and on-chain infrastructure Tokenizing real-world assets has long faced challenges related to trust and data accuracy. Smart contracts require reliable, real-time information to execute transactions automatically, and RedStone Oracles will supply verified market data directly to the Canton Network. The integration ensures that tokenized assets operate with high transparency, automated compliance, and reduced reliance on intermediaries. By providing accurate feeds for interest rates, FX and commodity prices, Net Asset Values, and corporate actions, the partnership positions Canton Network as a secure, privacy-focused on-chain platform for regulated financial operations. A milestone for institutional adoption of blockchain This move marks a significant step in bridging traditional finance with decentralized infrastructure. Canton Network’s interoperable blockchain, combined with RedStone’s resilient oracle services, addresses key barriers to large-scale adoption of tokenized assets, offering the speed, security, and transparency required for institutional investors. The collaboration signals that blockchain technology is ready to handle complex, high-value financial instruments, paving the way for a new era in global capital markets where illiquid assets can be traded efficiently and securely on-chain. Industry analysts view the partnership as a major milestone in the maturation of the tokenized finance sector, demonstrating that integrating blockchain with trusted data sources can deliver scalable, compliant solutions for institutional investors worldwide. Strategic investment backs expansion Digital Asset, the creator of the Canton Network, has secured strategic investments from major Wall Street firms, including Goldman Sachs and BNP Paribas, to accelerate institutional blockchain adoption and the growth of tokenized assets. The funding will support the expansion of Canton’s privacy-focused network, designed for financial institutions seeking secure, compliant on-chain solutions.
Canton Network partners with RedStone to expand DeFi access to $6T assets
Key Takeaways Canton Network has partnered with RedStone, an oracle provider, to enhance DeFi access to $6 trillion worth of tokenized real-world assets. RedStone becomes the primary oracle for Canton Network, enabling secure, real-time data feeds for institutional-grade and decentralized finance applications. Share this article Canton Network, a public blockchain tailored for the financial industry, today partnered with RedStone, an oracle provider delivering real-time data feeds for blockchain ecosystems, to expand DeFi access to $6 trillion worth of assets. The partnership enables Canton Network to extend DeFi connectivity to its tokenized real-world assets through RedStone’s oracle infrastructure. RedStone serves as the primary oracle for Canton Network, facilitating secure data feeds that bridge institutional markets with decentralized finance protocols. Canton Network focuses on on-chain privacy to enable secure and interoperable asset movements across decentralized systems. The integration with RedStone’s data feeds allows the blockchain to tokenize institutional assets while maintaining its privacy-focused design. The collaboration supports interoperability between traditional financial systems and decentralized finance protocols, allowing regulated real-world assets to connect with DeFi applications through RedStone’s compliant oracle technology.
BlackRock bets on tokenization, but IMF warns of uncontrollable ‘atomic’ domino effect
BlackRock, the largest asset management firm in the world, has described tokenization as the most critical market upgrade since the early internet. On the other hand, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) describes it as a volatile, untested architecture that can amplify financial shocks at machine speed. Both institutions are looking at the same innovation. Yet, the distance between their conclusions captures the most consequential debate in modern finance: whether tokenized markets will reinvent global infrastructure or reproduce its worst fragilities with new velocity. The institutional divide on tokenization In a Dec. 1 op-ed for The Economist, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and COO Rob Goldstein argued that recording asset ownership on digital ledgers represents the next structural step in a decades-long modernization arc. They framed tokenization as a financial leap comparable to the arrival of SWIFT in 1977 or the shift from paper certificates to electronic trading. In contrast, the IMF warned in a recent explainer video that tokenized markets could be prone to flash crashes, liquidity fractures, and smart-contract domino cascades that turn local failures into systemic shocks. The split over tokenization arises from the fact that the two institutions operate under very different mandates. BlackRock, which has already rolled out tokenized funds and dominates the spot ETF market for digital assets, approaches tokenization as an infrastructure play. Its incentive is to expand global market access, compress settlement cycles to “T+0,” and broaden the investable universe. In that context, blockchain-based ledgers look like the next logical step in the evolution of financial plumbing. This means the technology offers a way to strip out costs and latency in the traditional financial world. However, the IMF operates from the opposite direction. As the stabilizer of the global monetary system, it focuses on the hard-to-predict feedback loops that arise when markets operate at extremely high speed. Traditional finance relies on settlement delays to net transactions and conserve liquidity. Tokenization introduces instantaneous settlement and composability across smart contracts. That structure is efficient in calm periods but can propagate shocks far faster than human intermediaries can respond. These perspectives do not contradict each other so much as they reflect different layers of responsibility. BlackRock is tasked with building the next generation of investment products. The IMF is tasked with identifying the fault lines before they spread. Tokenization sits at the intersection of that tension. A technology with two futures Fink and Goldstein describe tokenization as a bridge “built from both sides of a river,” connecting traditional institutions with digital-first innovators. They argue that shared digital ledgers can eliminate slow, manual processes and replace disparate settlement pipelines with standardized rails that participants across jurisdictions can verify instantly. This view is not theoretical, though the data requires careful parsing. According to Token Terminal, the broader tokenized ecosystem is approaching $300 billion, a figure heavily anchored by dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDT and USDC. Tokenized Assets AUM (Source: Token Terminal) However, the actual test lies in the roughly $30 billion wedge of regulated real-world assets (RWAs), such as tokenized Treasuries, private credit, and bonds. Indeed, these regulated assets are no longer restricted to pilot programs. Tokenized government bond funds such as BlackRock’s BUIDL and Ondo’s products are now live. At the same time, precious metals have moved on-chain as well, with significant volumes in digital gold. The market has also seen fractionalized real estate shares and tokenized private credit instruments expand the investable universe beyond listed bonds and equities. In light of this, forecasts for this sector range from the optimistic to the astronomical. Reports from firms such as RedStone Finance project a “blue sky” scenario in which on-chain RWAs could reach $30 trillion by 2034. Meanwhile, more conservative estimates from McKinsey & Co. suggest the market could double as funds and treasuries migrate to blockchain rails. For BlackRock, even the conservative case represents a multi-trillion-dollar restructuring of financial infrastructure. Yet the IMF sees a parallel, less stable future. Its concern centers on the mechanics of atomic settlement. In today’s markets, trades are often “netted” at the end of the day, meaning banks only need to move the difference between what they bought and sold. Atomic settlement requires every trade to be fully funded instantly. In stressed conditions, this demand for pre-funded liquidity can spike, potentially causing liquidity to evaporate exactly when it is needed most. If automated contracts then trigger liquidations “like falling dominoes,” a localized problem could become a systemic cascade before regulators even receive the alert. The liquidity paradox Part of the enthusiasm around tokenization stems from the question of where the next cycle of market growth may originate. The last crypto cycle was characterized by memecoin-driven speculation, which generated high activity but drained liquidity without expanding long-term adoption. Advocates of tokenization argue that the next expansion will be driven not by retail speculation but by institutional yield strategies, including tokenized private credit, real-world debt instruments, and enterprise-grade vaults delivering predictable returns. Tokenization, in this framing, is not merely a technical upgrade but a new liquidity channel. Institutional allocators facing a constrained traditional yield environment may migrate to tokenized credit markets, where automated strategies and programmable settlement can yield higher, more efficient returns. However, this future remains unrealized because large banks, insurers, and pension funds face regulatory constraints. The Basel III Endgame rules, for example, assign punitive capital treatment to certain digital assets classified as “Group 2,” discouraging exposure to tokenized instruments unless regulators clarify the distinctions between volatile cryptocurrencies and regulated tokenized securities. Until that boundary is defined, the “wall of money” remains more potential than reality. Furthermore, the IMF argues that even if the funds arrive, they carry hidden leverage. A complex stack of automated contracts, collateralized debt positions, and tokenized credit instruments may create recursive dependencies. During periods of volatility, these chains can unwind faster than risk engines are designed to handle. The very features that make tokenization attractive, such as the instant settlement, composability, and global access, create feedback mechanisms that could amplify stress. The tokenization question The debate between BlackRock and the IMF is not about whether tokenization will integrate into global markets; it already has. It is about the trajectory of that integration. One path envisions a more efficient, accessible, globally synchronized market structure. The other anticipates a landscape where speed and connectivity create new forms of systemic vulnerability. However, in that future, the outcome will depend on whether global institutions can converge on coherent standards for interoperability, disclosure, and automated risk controls.
Tokenized assets surge: $60 billion market predicted by 2026
Tokenized real-world assets are projected to reach $60 billion in 2026, according to a report released by blockchain oracle platform RedStone. Summary RedStone’s report predicts substantial growth in tokenized assets. The trend is fueled by rising institutional interest in private credit, tokenized Treasuries, and equities. Private credit is projected to represent 45-50% of the tokenized asset market by 2026. The market has experienced substantial growth since late 2023, with institutional interest increasing in on-chain private credit, tokenized Treasuries, and tokenized equities, the report stated. Private credit currently represents the largest category within the tokenized asset sector and is expected to account for approximately 45-50% of the real-world asset market in 2026, according to RedStone’s analysis. Tokenized equities are forecast to experience the fastest growth rate, with projections indicating 200-300% expansion following anticipated clarification of U.S. regulatory rules in mid-2026, the report said. Tokenized Treasuries, including BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, are also expected to register strong growth, according to the findings. RedStone operates as a blockchain oracle platform that provides data feeds for decentralized finance applications.
The Inconvenient Truth: Only 10% of Crypto Actually Makes You Money
Crypto’s been dreaming big on yield possibilities for years. There’s staking on giants, stablecoins that generate interest, DeFi lending protocols, and even tokenized Treasuries. The pipeline for turning digital coins into actual income is wide open, and juicy. Compare apples to apples But experts say right now, just about 8% to 11% of all crypto assets are cashing in on these yield streams. On the other hand, regular old traditional finance, aka TradFi, is rocking 55% to 65% of assets generating returns, according to RedStone’s latest research report. What’s going on? It’s not that crypto’s yield game is broken. The problem is the total mess around disclosure and transparency. RedStone counts something like $300 billion to $400 billion of yield-earning crypto in a $3.55 trillion market. That’s roughly the 10% figure, but it’s probably an overestimate since the same tokens get counted twice when staked coins get redeployed within DeFi protocols. It’s like counting your paycheck and your tax refund as separate incomes. Spoiler, they’re not. The regular finance world has a century’s head start with well-oiled machines for risk ratings, disclosure rules, and stress tests. That lets hedge funds and pension giants compare apples to apples. Crypto has the juicy apples but no reliable recipe for comparison. Transparency Enter the GENIUS Act, a regulatory accomplishment that cleared the grey haze around payment stablecoins. This clarity sent yield-bearing stablecoins soaring 300% year-over-year. The law deals with reserve transparency and compliance instead of vague “Is crypto legal?” questions. That’s progress. But institutions want to stack crypto yield products against traditional instruments, comparing risk-adjusted returns like a calculator on steroids. Without juicy details on asset quality, credit exposure, or counterparty risk, investors stay cautious. RedStone’s bottom line? The barrier to massive institutional crypto adoption boils down to one word, transparency. kripto.NEWS 💥 The fastest crypto news aggregator 200+ crypto updates daily. Multilingual & instant. Visit Site Coordination from issuers, platforms, and auditors Crypto’s on-chain transparency is ironically a double-edged sword. Everything’s visible, but without a standard framework, all that data is heaps of scattered puzzle pieces. The future? Likely not new yield products, because crypto already offers a tasty buffet from staked blue-chip coins to yield-bearing stablecoins and tokenized government bonds. The missing ingredient is standardized risk measurement, clear disclosures, third-party audits, and honest accounting for rehypothecation and double-counting. On-chain data is there for the taking. It just needs coordination from issuers, platforms, and auditors to build trust frameworks that money managers actually believe in. Until that happens, most crypto investors are just sitting on dead money, watching others get the yield party started. Written by András Mészáros Cryptocurrency and Web3 expert, founder of Kriptoworld LinkedIn | X (Twitter) | More articles With years of experience covering the blockchain space, András delivers insightful reporting on DeFi, tokenization, altcoins, and crypto regulations shaping the digital economy.
Only 10% of crypto earns yield now — why most investors are sitting on dead money
Crypto has spent years building yield infrastructure, such as staking on Ethereum and Solana, yield-bearing stablecoins, DeFi lending protocols, and tokenized Treasuries. The pipes already exist, the APYs are live, yet only 8% to 11% of the total crypto market generates yield today, compared to 55% to 65% of traditional financial (TradFi) assets, according to RedStone’s latest analysis. That penetration gap isn’t a product problem, but rather a disclosure problem. RedStone tallies roughly $300 billion to $400 billion of yield-bearing crypto assets against a $3.55 trillion total market capitalization to arrive at that 8% to 11% figure, with a caveat: the share is likely overstated because some positions get counted twice when staked assets are also deposited in DeFi protocols. The comparison benchmark encompasses a wide range of investments, including corporate bonds, dividend equities, money-market funds, and structured credit. TradFi’s advantage isn’t exotic instruments. It’s a century of standardized risk ratings, mandatory disclosure rules, and stress-testing frameworks that let institutions compare yield products on comparable terms. Crypto has the products, but not the comparability, and that mismatch keeps institutional capital on the sidelines, even when yields run double digits. Policy as catalyst, not solution The GENIUS Act established a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring full reserve backing and oversight under the Bank Secrecy Act. RedStone pointed to that clarity as the catalyst behind roughly 300% year-over-year growth in yield-bearing stablecoins, a segment that had stalled under regulatory uncertainty. The law doesn’t mandate risk transparency, but addresses reserve composition and compliance, removing the binary question of whether stablecoins could operate in a legal gray zone. That shift allowed issuers and platforms to move from “is this allowed?” to “how do we scale this?” and created the conditions for institutions to start asking more challenging questions about asset quality, collateral chains, and counterparty risk. Independent coverage of the Act reflects a similar dynamic: regulation reduces uncertainty, but institutions still require more robust risk metrics before scaling up allocations. The law is necessary but not sufficient. What’s missing is the apparatus that enables a treasury desk or asset manager to compare the risk-adjusted return of a yield-bearing stablecoin to that of a money-market fund, or to evaluate the credit exposure of a DeFi lending pool against a corporate bond ladder. TradFi has that apparatus, with credit ratings, prospectuses, stress scenarios, and liquidity buckets. Crypto has APY leaderboards and TVL dashboards, which indicate where yield is generated, but not what risks underpin it. Transparency deficit RedStone’s analysis distills the problem into a single line: “The barrier to institutional adoption at scale is risk transparency.” Unpack what that means in practice. First, there’s no comparable risk scoring across yield products. A 5% yield on staked ETH carries different liquidity, slashing, and smart contract risks than a 5% yield on a stablecoin backed by short-term Treasuries. However, no standardized framework exists to quantify these differences. Second, asset-quality breakdowns remain inconsistent. DeFi protocols disclose collateral ratios and liquidation thresholds, but tracking rehypothecation requires piecing together on-chain forensics and off-chain custodian reports. Third, oracle and validator dependencies are rarely disclosed with the rigor TradFi applies to operational risk. A yield product that depends on a single price feed or a small validator set carries concentration risk that isn’t surfaced in user-facing dashboards. Then there’s the double-counting issue that RedStone explicitly flags. When staked ETH is wrapped, deposited into a lending protocol, and then used as collateral for another position, TVL metrics increase, and “yield-bearing” percentages overstate the actual capital deployed. Traditional finance accounting rules separate principal from derivative exposure. Crypto’s on-chain transparency creates the opposite problem, with everything being visible, but aggregating it into meaningful risk metrics requires infrastructure that doesn’t yet exist at scale. Closing the gap The next leg isn’t about inventing new yield products. Staked blue chip assets, yield-bearing stablecoins, and tokenized government debt already cover the risk spectrum, ranging from variable to fixed, and from decentralized to custodial. What’s needed is the measurement layer: standardized risk disclosures, third-party audits of collateral and counterparty exposure, and uniform treatment of rehypothecation and double-counting in reported metrics. That’s not a technical problem, since on-chain data is auditable by design, but it requires coordination across issuers, platforms, and auditors to build frameworks that institutions recognize as credible. Crypto’s yield pipes now exist. Staking on proof-of-stake networks delivers predictable returns tied to network security. Yield-bearing stablecoins offer dollar-denominated income with varying degrees of reserve transparency. DeFi protocols offer variable rates that are driven by the supply and demand for specific assets. The 8% to 11% penetration rate isn’t a signal that crypto lacks yield opportunities. It’s a signal that the risk attached to those opportunities isn’t legible to the allocators who control the bulk of global capital. TradFi’s yield penetration didn’t emerge because traditional assets are inherently safer, but rather because their risks are measured, disclosed, and comparable. Until crypto builds that measurement layer, the adoption bottleneck won’t be product gaps or regulatory ambiguity, but the inability to answer what is at risk for the yield.
Filled orders
Delivery scenarios