Anchorage Digital says Fed’s proposed payment account is no 'workable substitute' for master account
Federally chartered national bank Anchorage Digital says the Federal Reserve's proposed payment account that would give some crypto companies access to the central bank doesn't work.
In a comment letter filed this week in response to the Fed's new payment account structure, the bank said it supports the Fed's efforts to revamp payment system access, but said its proposal would place it and others under a tier that opens it up to intense review and alongside other institutions that don't have a federal supervisor.
"ADB supports the Board's effort to modernize payment system access, but the proposed account, which lacks FedACH access, imposes overnight balance limits, offers no intraday liquidity, and pays no interest on reserve balances, isn't a workable substitute for the Master Account that member national banks have held for over a century," the bank said in a statement.
Last year, Fed Governor Christopher J. Waller floated the concept, referring to it as a "skinny master account." A master account, which Anchorage applied for in August 2025, gives financial institutions direct access to the Federal Reserve’s payment systems. Institutions without master accounts typically must work through partner banks that have this access to provide payment services.
In May, the Federal Reserve sought public feedback on a proposal to establish a new type of “payment account” that could allow certain crypto companies to access the Fed’s clearing and settlement systems. Under the proposal, eligible account holders would be able to use payment services with automated safeguards, but they would not have access to intraday credit, the discount window, or interest payments on balances maintained at the Fed.
Even with these limitations, gaining access to these accounts — referred to as "master accounts" — would allow crypto firms to connect directly to the U.S. payment system’s core infrastructure rather than depending on intermediary banks.
Specifically, Anchorage has concerns that banks like theirs would not have access to the FedACH, which is a system operated by the central bank that processes electronic payments between banks and other financial institutions.
"The exclusion of FedACH access materially limits the functionality of the Payment Account and would require Payment Account holders to continue to rely on intermediaries for day-to-day payment and settlement activities," the bank said.
Anchorage also said the central bank's proposal would further require firms to work with intermediaries to set a required closing account balance and said a skinny master account should include interest on reserve balances.
What others say
Almost 100 other comment letters have been filed by crypto groups and exchanges, bank associations and lawmakers over the past few days.
In her letter, crypto-friendly Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said she looked forward to the Fed "finalizing the rules and policies implementing the payment account as soon as possible." The Blockchain Association said the proposed payment accounts could be viewed as a positive step, but said they were not a substitute for master accounts.
"As currently drafted, however, the Payment Accounts established by the proposal come with too many restrictions to achieve the Board’s stated goals," the association said. "Most importantly, the proposed lack of FedACH access and zero interest on account balances would make the accounts commercially impractical."
Others voiced concerns about firms' access to the Fed. In a letter from the Financial Services Forum, The Clearing House Association and the Bank Policy Institute, they warned that some institutions would be "subject to less rigorous supervision and regulation."
"The Associations are supportive of private-sector innovation in financial services," they said. "But when that innovation implicates broader issues of financial stability, national security and credit availability, the public interest must appropriately be taken into account."
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Nvidia (NVDA.US) plans to invest $3 billion to enter SB Energy: from selling chips to securing the OpenAI "electricity-park-computing power" chain
Analysts point out that Nvidia may be able to intervene early in a critical aspect of GPU order fulfillment by investing in the developer of OpenAI’s data centers.

Ethereum and Solana may become scarcer – THESE Grayscale projections say…

‘Bitcoin doesn’t need MSCI’ – Strategy fires back as MSTR deletion odds hit 73%

Five factors are combining to intensify, JPMorgan: Global food crisis may erupt next year
JPMorgan has warned that driven by the combined effects of war, weather, storage, water resources, and waste, a global food crisis may erupt in the first half of 2027. The global food inflation rate is expected to rise from 2.8% in the first half of 2026 to 5% in the first half of 2027. The overlap of a super El Niño and energy shocks will push the Food CPI up by an additional 1.5 percentage points, with emerging markets such as India, Indonesia, and Brazil being the most affected.
