Oil prices won’t return to pre-war levels soon? They said something almost no Americans
Recently, the world's two largest oilfield service companies said something that almost no American wants to hear.
SLB last Friday and Halliburton earlier this week stated that they expect crude oil prices to remain high for a longer period. This will immediately impact a range of petroleum-derived products and other industries, but the most closely watched is undoubtedly gasoline.
U.S. President Donald Trump once remarked that Americans should expect gasoline prices to remain high "for a while." After the US went to war with Iran, the average US gasoline price quickly broke through $4 per gallon, and this price is unlikely to retreat as quickly as consumers or the Trump administration would hope.
The global energy market is undergoing one of its worst scenarios—a partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz. In peacetime, about one fifth of the world’s crude oil and refined oil products are transported through this strait. Attacks on pipelines and other energy infrastructure have also severely impacted the crude oil market.
With a market capitalization of $82 billion and operations in over 100 countries, the American giant SLB stated that it expects "post-conflict liquid commodity prices to remain above pre-conflict levels." The company said this reflects short-term supply disruptions resulting from damaged infrastructure, production interruptions, and other impacts, as well as a geopolitical risk premium.
SLB noted that many countries may respond by prioritizing supply diversification, investing in exploration and domestic resource development, and replenishing strategic reserves once the conflict has subsided.
Halliburton CEO Jeff Miller, in a call with analysts after the $33 billion company reported earnings on Tuesday, expressed a similar viewpoint.
Miller stated, “I think the situation in the Middle East will have a significant and lasting impact on the global energy industry.” He said that energy security “is no longer just a talking point,” and that the company expects to see “increased investment in localized oil and gas development, as well as an urgent push for diversification of oil and gas sources in countries lacking their own resources.”
Miller said that restoring oil and gas production and inventory “will not be a quick or simple process.” He stated, “Big picture, this means the global oil and gas fundamentals are much tighter than they were 60 days ago.”
SLB also indicated it expects short-cycle project investment to increase in North America and Latin America, while long-cycle development will also rise, especially in deepwater offshore markets.
The company added: “Unless prolonged conflict causes economic slowdown and demand destruction, these supply-side responses will reinforce our confidence in a broad upstream market recovery in 2027 and 2028.”
Halliburton’s Miller essentially expressed the same view, emphasizing that upstream investment and oilfield services are facing a “more constructive environment.” He said Halliburton “will thrive in this market.”
Since the beginning of this year, shares of both companies have risen more than 40%, compared to a roughly 4% gain in the S&P 500. Last week, Halliburton rose nearly 7%, and SLB rose nearly 5%.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
CoreWeave default probability exceeds 60%! Jensen Huang "puts out the fire": Financing costs are declining, no need for NVIDIA to backstop
After Jensen Huang's speech, CoreWeave's stock price, which had fallen by as much as 9.5% in early trading, turned positive. The company's five-year CDS rose above 1,190 basis points during Thursday’s session, a historical high reflecting the cost of debt default protection, while yields on some of its corporate bonds have climbed above 15% to 16%. The five-year CDS spreads for Oracle, Amazon, Google’s parent company, and Meta are all at historically high levels. Deutsche Bank analysts believe that as the AI capital expenditure cycle is increasingly supported by debt rather than free cash flow, investors must place greater emphasis on signals from the credit market. Overall, while AI-related financing costs are not yet excessively high, worrying signs have begun to emerge.
Bitcoin volatility trends show Bitcoin is less volatile than 57% of S&P 500 stocks
Wall Street is wary of Bessent making another move to suppress yields; key clues may emerge this Friday
This Friday, major primary dealers of government bonds will receive the U.S. Treasury's routine survey before the refinancing announcement is released. Citigroup expects the survey may hint at a reduction in long-term bond issuance, or even the cancellation of 20-year U.S. Treasury bonds. Morgan Stanley emphasizes: "The next two refinancing announcements will be crucial, especially the one in November, which comes right after the midterm elections."
Risk aversion outweighs inflation concerns, US and European government bonds rise across the board, US Treasury yields plunge more than 10 basis points intraday
Investors concerned about rising inflation are shifting their focus to the potential impact of high borrowing costs on economic growth. Some commentators have linked the recent decline in U.S. Treasury yields to surging financing costs for AI-related companies, suggesting that pressure in the technology stocks and AI infrastructure sectors is driving funds toward safe-haven assets such as government bonds.
Crypto prices
More
