Pierre Rochard warns US regulators over Bitcoin gap in Basel rewrite
Pierre Rochard, CEO of The Bitcoin Bond Company, warned US banking regulators that their sweeping Basel III capital rewrite leaves unresolved how Bitcoin-related activities should be treated, a gap he says could create legal risk and shape how much capital banks must hold against the asset.
In a formal comment submitted March 29 to the US Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Rochard said agencies cannot finalize rules that effectively determine capital treatment for Bitcoin (BTC)-related activities without clearly explaining the framework and evidence behind that treatment.
The regulators’ March 19 proposals, a package that would comprehensively overhaul the existing US bank capital framework, did not mention Bitcoin, crypto or digital assets a single time. It covers credit risk, market risk, operational risk and counterparty exposures for the largest US banks, but leaves uncertainty over how existing categories apply to BTC holdings, lending, custody and derivatives.
The gap matters because Basel already imposes a harsh capital treatment on certain unbacked crypto exposures, but the US proposals do not say whether that framework will apply to Bitcoin-related activities. For banks, that leaves the economics of custody, lending, derivatives and direct holdings unresolved.
The Bitcoin Bond Company’s letter to regulators. Source:
Pierre Rochard
Rochard argued that regulators cannot leave that question unresolved and said a final rule that quietly imposes (or preserves) a capital treatment for Bitcoin-related activities without explicit explanation could face legal vulnerability.
Rochard presses regulators over Bitcoin treatment
He pointed to the Basel Committee’s crypto asset framework, known as SCO60, which assigns a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets such as Bitcoin. According to Rochard, US regulators must clarify whether they intend to adopt that standard, apply elements of it selectively, or rely instead on existing domestic capital categories.
Related: Bitcoin advocate group to fight Basel’s ‘toxic’ treatment of cryptocurrency
Rochard noted that the same agencies have recently been explicit about other digital assets. On March 5, they issued a tokenized securities FAQ stating that eligible tokenized securities should generally receive the same capital treatment as their non-tokenized counterparts and that the capital framework is “technology neutral,” giving banks clear guidance on that front. By contrast, there is still no comparable explanation for how Bitcoin exposures should be treated.
Without that clarity, banks would be left to interpret how rules apply to direct Bitcoin holdings, Bitcoin-collateralized lending, custody services and derivatives exposure, increasing uncertainty across the industry.
Before the proposal’s release, some analysts had expected the re-proposal could ease capital requirements and potentially unlock liquidity for Bitcoin-related activities.
“The fiat system should stop sabotaging itself,” Rochard said in his comment on X. “Bitcoin banking rules would improve bank net interest margins and lower interest rates for borrowers.”
Cointelegraph reached out to Rochard for comment, but had not received a response by publication.
Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum — BIP-360 co-author
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Anthropic’s performance is “good but not good enough”: under “adjusted profitability,” revenue growth sharply brakes!
Anthropic's third-quarter revenue reached $16.8 billion, an increase of nearly 50% quarter-over-quarter, and achieved "adjusted profitability"—but the market remains unconvinced. The main concern lies in monthly growth slowing sharply from 33% to single digits, leaving a gap of several billion dollars short of the year-end $100 billion target. Token prices have hit historic lows, with the disconnect between volume and price becoming increasingly prominent. Whether this "good but not good enough" performance can support a $2 trillion IPO valuation remains uncertain.
CoreWeave Drops 15%, AI Computing Power Business Faces Financing Test
CoreWeave bonds have fallen below 80% of face value, with yields surpassing 15% and a default probability exceeding 50% within five years. The company’s CEO attempted to reassure the market by citing an order backlog of over $100 billion, but analysts pointed out that orders do not equate to cash: “If borrowing costs are 9% but project returns are only 5%, the larger the scale, the greater the value destruction.” AI infrastructure-related stocks such as Oracle have also seen significant declines, with concerns spreading across the entire high-yield bond market. Musk sighed: "Oh dear!"
XRP, Chainlink and Zcash hover at key support levels as volume dries up
Berkshire increases investment by $330 million, this "APP Renovation Factory" sees its stock price soar over 40% in a single day
Berkshire Hathaway has made an additional $330 million investment in Bending Spoons, increasing its stake to 4%. This news sent Bending Spoons’ stock soaring over 41% in a single day. The transaction marks the latest major capital deployment under new CEO Greg Abel. Bending Spoons specializes in acquiring "outdated apps" and uses AI to restructure cost structures and business models to generate cash flow.
Crypto prices
More
