Digital infrastructure and blockchain technology became a central topic during discussions at the Milken Institute 2026 conference after U.S. Representative Bryan Steil outlined how tokenization and distributed ledger systems could reshape access to financial services and online platforms.
Speaking at the event, Steil argued that digital transformation has historically altered industries and suggested similar changes may occur as blockchain-based systems expand into broader economic activity.
During the conference, Steil said digitalization has already reshaped several sectors over the past three decades. He cited examples such as digital music, digital newspapers, and digital banking, noting that these changes have shifted how individuals interact with services and information.
Steil stated that tokenization, blockchain, and distributed ledger technology could represent the next step in this process. According to him, digital infrastructure has become “essential to any given product,” reflecting the way many services now rely on online platforms and mobile access.
He suggested that blockchain-based systems may operate as a horizontal layer across industries. In this framework, tokenization could introduce structural changes within various sectors while enabling new ways for assets and services to be accessed through digital platforms.
Steil also pointed to potential implications for financial systems. He said distributed ledger technology may expand opportunities for individuals to access financing structures, including loan-related arrangements, through digital infrastructure.
In his remarks, Steil highlighted decentralized finance as an example of how blockchain could allow individuals to transact value directly with one another. He described scenarios where transactions might occur with minimal costs and without the involvement of traditional third-party intermediaries.
Steil added that this type of infrastructure could broaden participation in financial systems by reducing barriers associated with traditional financial networks. His comments framed tokenization as a technological shift comparable to earlier digital transformations, where online systems gradually became integrated into everyday services.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});Steil’s remarks prompted discussion on social media about the policy framework surrounding blockchain adoption. A X user, PFStudio.eth, wrote that broader adoption of tokenized financial systems may depend on legislative developments, specifically the proposed Digital Asset Market Structure.
The commenter said progress could remain limited unless the legislation advances. According to the post, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott has been aligned with banking institutions that oppose stablecoin yield provisions.
PFStudio.eth argued that the bill’s language could be revised, but said political dynamics have created a legislative stalemate.
Another participant, identified as Kim, expressed uncertainty about the broader impact of stablecoin yield. Kim suggested that policymakers might consider focusing on other financial policy priorities and mentioned the possibility of state-level experiments involving local currencies facilitated by federal authorities.
Related: Tokenized RWAs Hit $21B TVL as U.S. Treasuries Dominate
