Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnAISquareMore
2021 Star Projects Survival Record: Who’s Left After the Initial Investment Rush?

2021 Star Projects Survival Record: Who’s Left After the Initial Investment Rush?

Odaily星球日报Odaily星球日报2025/12/24 07:20
Show original
By:Odaily星球日报

Do you still remember the bull market of 2021?

That year, bitcoin broke through $60,000, ethereum reached an all-time high, NFT avatars were selling for millions of dollars, and the metaverse concept made everyone believe we were standing on the eve of an internet revolution. The cryptocurrency industry experienced an unprecedented financing frenzy. Venture capital institutions rushed in, afraid of missing the next 100x project. In that era of mania, it seemed that any project labeled "Web3" could easily raise tens of millions of dollars.

According to Venture Capital analysis, crypto technology startups raised $25.2 billion that year, a staggering 713% increase from the $3.1 billion in 2020. However, four years later, when we look back at the more than 400 highly funded projects, only a handful are still standing strong.

Most projects have already faded away. They either announced the cessation of operations, pivoted to other projects, were crippled after being hacked, suffered huge negative impacts following the collapse of FTX, or simply became zombie projects lying dormant.

2021 Star Projects Survival Record: Who’s Left After the Initial Investment Rush? image 0

Note: This table includes 67 representative cases from the top 400 projects by financing amount in 2021 that have already shut down, gone to zero, or have low operational activity, with a total financing amount exceeding $5 billion. The financing amount statistics are limited to financing rounds in 2021 only, excluding rounds before 2020 or after 2022. Projects marked in red in the table indicate that their current market value is already lower than the total financing amount in 2021.

The most devastating disasters occurred in the centralized finance platform sector. FTX, once seen as Binance's biggest competitor and having raised $1.32 billion, collapsed spectacularly in November 2022, with founder SBF sentenced to 25 years in prison for fraud. Almost simultaneously, Celsius Network also crashed. This crypto lending platform, which raised $750 million, promised users an 18% annualized deposit yield. Its token CEL plummeted from $8 to $0.02, evaporating 99.73% of its value. BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Babel Finance, and Prime Trust—names that once represented the "regularization" and "institutionalization" of crypto finance—raised over $500 million in total, but fell like dominoes during the liquidity crisis of 2022.

If the collapse of centralized platforms was due to fraudulent business models, then the collective death of NFT and metaverse projects was more like the dissipation of a nationwide illusion.

In 2021, everyone was talking about virtual land, digital art, and Play-to-Earn games. Axie Infinity, leveraging the "play-to-earn" concept, raised $159.5 million, and its token AXS once soared to $164.9. In-game pet NFTs were even speculated to be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars each. In developing countries like the Philippines, countless people quit their jobs to "gold farm" full-time, seeing Axie as a chance to change their fate. However, when the game's economic model collapsed, AXS plummeted 99.49% to $0.85, and those who invested their life savings ultimately realized it was just a Ponzi game that required a constant influx of new players.

The Sandbox, a representative project of the metaverse concept, raised $93 million, and its virtual land NFTs were snapped up in 2021, with the SAND token soaring to $8.4. But three years later, this so-called metaverse is empty, with only a handful of participants in the occasional events. Although the official Twitter is still being updated, the comment section is already deserted. Even more ironically, most NFT platforms focused on music and art have become zombie projects.

Projecting the lessons of 2021 onto today reveals some harsh truths: most projects are products of the cycle, and those that truly create lasting value account for less than 5%. This 5% is usually only identifiable at the lowest point of the bear market. The wheels of history keep turning, 2025 is about to end, and a new cycle is about to begin. When the new tide recedes, how many of today's projects will still be wearing their swim trunks?

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Report: TSMC to Raise Wafer Foundry Prices by 3% to 6% Starting January Next Year, Order Visibility Extended to 2030

According to media reports, TSMC's advanced and high-priced processes such as 2nm and 3nm have seen the largest price increases; mature and specialty processes are subject to individual negotiation based on products, capacity utilization, and customer conditions. Currently, TSMC's 8-inch fabs have a capacity utilization rate exceeding 100%, and processes below 45nm are at full capacity. The construction of AI data centers is not only driving demand for GPU and HBM, but also boosting orders for mature processes such as PMIC, MCU, and analog ICs.

华尔街见闻2026/09/23 20:36

U.S. Treasury plans to repurchase up to $6 billion in long-term bonds, 30-year yield hits highest since 2007

This is the second round of enhanced long-term bond buybacks by the Treasury, this time focusing on 20- to 30-year government bonds. After the announcement of the planned upper limit, the yield on 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds continued to rise, at one point exceeding 5.4%. In the first round of enhanced buybacks two weeks ago, the upper buyback target was also $6 billion, which was lower than some market participants had expected, and the actual buyback amounted to only $5.2 billion due to insufficient competitive bidding, according to the Treasury.

华尔街见闻2026/09/23 20:36