Solana Foundation Chairman criticizes The New York Times for biased coverage of innovation and artificial intelligence sectors
Jinse Finance reported that Lily Liu, Chair of the Solana Foundation, posted on social media criticizing The New York Times for its apparent ideological bias in reporting on innovation and artificial intelligence. Liu stated that The New York Times portrays innovation and wealth creation as "predatory" and "oppressive," while in reality, artificial intelligence is a major driving force in global capital markets and a key element of national strategy. This statement supports David Sacks in refuting The New York Times' allegations of conflicts of interest during his tenure as the White House head of artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency. Several industry insiders have also questioned the credibility of The New York Times' reporting, believing it has become the "left-wing version of Page Six."
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Big short Burry increases short positions on Micron and Nebius, with the logic that "memory supply surge will put downward pressure on prices"
Michael Burry has dramatically increased his short positions on Micron, Palantir, and semiconductor ETFs, stating that the scale is “quite large.” His main reasoning is that Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron squeezed their conventional DRAM production to meet AI-driven HBM demand, resulting in a shortage; however, with production capacity now ramping up, the Damocles sword of oversupply is hanging over the market. The inventory warning from Acer’s CEO has further convinced him that the memory cycle has already peaked.
Colorpak Indonesia announces extraordinary shareholder meeting
Crypto prices
More
