Bitcoin Stock-to-Flow model creator PlanB slams Ethereum, calls it ‘premined shitcoin’
Nearly three years after Vitalik Buterin mocked his Stock-to-Flow model, anonymous analyst PlanB hit back, calling Ethereum a “centralized premined shitcoin.”
PlanB, the anonymous analyst behind Bitcoin’s ( BTC ) Stock-to-Flow model, took aim at Ethereum ( ETH ) in a post on X, saying the project is looking worse than ever and arguing that centralized, premined coins like ETH— with proof-of-stake instead of proof-of-work and a flexible supply schedule — are harmful to the space and deserve to be mocked.
In an X post on April 20, PlanB wrote that “Ethereum is really not looking good now,” adding that “shitcoins like ETH, that are centralized premined” are “harmful and deserve all the mockery they get.”
PlanB’s comments come nearly three years after Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin criticized PlanB’s Stock-to-Flow model, which attempts to predict Bitcoin’s price based on the ratio between its existing supply and the rate of new issuance through mining.
Back in June 2022, Buterin posted: “Stock-to-flow is really not looking good now. I know it’s impolite to gloat and all that, but I think financial models that give people a false sense of certainty and predestination that number-will-go-up are harmful and deserve all the mockery they get,” a jab that came as Bitcoin’s price was diverging sharply from the projections made by the S2F model.
Now, PlanB seems to be returning fire, this time as Ethereum struggles to show any meaningful price momentum, with the market watching closely as the Ethereum Foundation continues a pattern of token dumps that have raised eyebrows across the crypto space.
In another X post, PlanB noted that Ethereum “qualifies on all aspects” to be a “real shitcoin” as it has “no fixed supply schedule” or “monetary policy.” Additionally, PlanB says, ETH has never outperformed Bitcoin. He also pointed to Ethereum’s token distribution model as a problem, saying the dumping from the Ethereum Foundation “comes with the premine,” which is a “big red flag.”
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The ultimate bottleneck for AI is not just electricity, but also the electricity bill! As data centers become a focus in the US elections, AI infrastructure investment faces a "ballot stress test"
In 2026, data center spending, as the backbone of the artificial intelligence industry, will reach a record high. However, alongside the boom in infrastructure construction, opposition to data centers has risen sharply this year. What started as a localized issue has quickly evolved into a key topic for the November midterm elections.

Eurozone Bond Yields Rise as Brent Touches $100; 10-Year Bund Yield Hits 15-Year High -- Update
From AI to gold and U.S. Treasury bonds: almost everything is surging to new highs, the market welcomes “Everything High”
AI capital expenditure and corporate earnings expectations continue to rise, while energy, gold, US Treasury yields, and market positions are also climbing. On the surface, this suggests a comprehensive increase in growth and risk appetite; however, when inflation, interest rates, and crowded trades are all at high levels, the market's tolerance for the sustainability of the AI boom is also narrowing.
Trump pushes Fed to cut rates, but Waller may go the opposite way: Next week’s meeting faces a “three-way choice”
Bloomberg columnist Claudia Sahm believes that as Trump continues to pressure for rate cuts while inflation remains well above the 2% target, raising rates is becoming an option again, leaving Waller facing a tough decision next week. The Federal Reserve has three paths: raising rates without Waller’s support, which could trigger rare internal divisions; holding steady, which may invite criticism of political interference; or Waller leading a rate hike, which could withstand White House pressure and defend policy independence.
